State health department surveys of home health agencies have traditionally focused on clinical quality, care delivery, and regulatory compliance with Conditions of Participation. Cybersecurity has been a background concern at best — the domain of HIPAA compliance officers and IT vendors, not surveyors reviewing clinical records and care plans.
That is changing. State surveyors — particularly in New York, Massachusetts, and California — are increasingly reviewing health information security documentation as part of routine and complaint-driven surveys. The combination of high-profile breaches, SHIN-NY implementation in New York, and CMS's expanded interest in health information security is bringing cybersecurity into the survey process.
What Triggers Cybersecurity Review During a Survey
Complaint-driven surveys following a breach. If your agency has reported a HIPAA breach, state health departments in many states conduct a follow-up assessment to determine whether the breach affected care delivery, whether patients were appropriately notified, and what remediation has been implemented.
State HIE compliance reviews. In New York, RHIO compliance reviews of SHIN-NY participation may be coordinated with or followed by state Department of Health review. Agencies with SHIN-NY compliance gaps that also have clinical quality findings may face coordinated regulatory attention.
Routine survey expansion. Several states have expanded their routine survey protocols to include a brief review of health information security practices — specifically, whether the agency has a written security program and evidence of staff training.
National survey protocol updates. CMS updates survey protocols periodically. Expect cybersecurity-related questions to appear in CMS's home health survey protocols within the next 2–3 years as HHS aligns its regulatory frameworks.
What Surveyors Actually Review
Based on the emerging survey practice in states with active cybersecurity oversight:
Written security program or HIPAA security policies. Surveyors request evidence that a written security program exists — not for a detailed technical review, but to confirm that the agency has addressed the HIPAA Security Rule requirement for documented policies. The existence of the document, its date, and who approved it are the primary review points.
Staff training documentation. Survey evidence of HIPAA security awareness training — specifically, completion records showing all staff have been trained within the past 12 months. Surveyors have found agencies where office staff were trained but field nurses and aides were not — a gap that is straightforward to cite.
Incident response procedures. Does the agency have a written incident response plan? Was it followed during any prior incidents? For agencies that have experienced a breach, surveyors may review whether the incident response procedures were implemented as documented.

